Democrats Protect U.N. Why?

Reposted as history. Originally posted in May of 2005.

Overtime at the Iniquity Factory
By Jed Babbin - 5/9/2005 - The American Spectator

We -- all those who care to see that justice is done, that those who bribed and were bribed are jailed and the money stolen from the people of Iraq returned -- have lost any faith in Volcker's investigation. It's about as likely to determine the facts of the Oil for Food scam as Mohamed el-Baradei's purblind International Atomic Energy Agency is to find that Iran is building nuclear weapons. El-Baradei may discover the truth if a mushroom cloud rises over Dallas, but Volcker never will.

The entire time this Oil-For-Bribes scandal has been going on, democrat leadership has defended the U.N., and attacked anyone who criticized the U.N. The democrat candidates in the recent campaign against Bush had one primary charge, that he did not let the U.N. handle Iraq. They kept insisting that he had to be "multi-lateral", which to them meant, let the U.N. take the lead in all international relations.

John Bolton, nominated for Ambassador to the U.N. is being attacked because he cannot be depended on to defer to the U.N. When did the democrat party become slavishly devoted to defending the U.N. in the face of massive evidence it is anti-American? And why are they so supportive of this anti-American institution?

Check out the recent proposal by democrat leadership that America hating communist W.E.B. DuBois be honored by our government. This was not done because there is some large group of Americans who wanted DuBois honored. International socialists wanted it. The national leadership of the democrat party is blatantly if quietly pro-socialist and active supporters of the global socialist movement. Democrat voters are neither pro U.N. or predominatly pro socialist (though a large number of the most militant are!).

Many people here in N.E. North Carolina don't even know what their party means when it takes actions like the DuBois incident. They are so far removed from the current leadership of the party that they seem puzzled when you mention socialism. We cannot ignore this disconnect. Local democrats cannot be allowed to pretend they are not culpable for the anti-American agenda of their national leadership. It is time for local democrats to decide if they are for socialism or not. The first step is to have a discussion of what that means.

In the meantime, the U.N. must be resisted strongly. Since the U.N. is at the center of the anti-American, pro socialist movement in the world, that means we must resist democrats at every level. We must start this resistance before that nuclear cloud rises over Dallas.