Holding Islam To Account

by Amil Imani - November 25th, 2006 - The American Thinker

Islam has spawned many sects that are master practitioners of the art of double standards. As far as Muslims are concerned what is good for Muslims is not good for the non-Muslims; and, what is bad for Muslims is good for non-Muslims.

What complicates matters is that there is no way of knowing which of the dozens of at-each-other’s-throat sects is the legitimate Islam. As soon as Muhammad died his religion of peace became a house of internal war: jockeying for power and leadership started, sects formed and splintered into sub-sects, and bloodletting began in earnest.

The internal infighting in Islam is presently playing in full color—in red—most dramatically, in the Iraqi theater. Shiite raid Sunni civilians, slaughter them like sheep, and toss their bodies like trash in the streets or the rivers. The Sunnis return the favor with just as much viciousness and savagery.

Question: if this is the way these Muslims treat each other, how would they deal with the infidels, when they have the chance?

This is a pretty good article to read for a summary of the religion of "peace". Amercans need to come up to speed on Islam as one of two things is about to happen. We will either be turned into a Muslim country or we will defeat this world wide plague. For a while I thought the latter was assured, but the desire for appeasement indicated by the recent elections has given me pause.

Some of the trends that should make us nervous are such things as the fact that Europe will be majority Muslim by 2050. Indonesia is starting to implement sharia law and much of Southeast Asia is turning Muslim. Russia is playing around with support for Iran because Russia is almost majority Muslim now. The war in Chechnya is Putin's attempt to stop this but the outcome there is far from certain. Putin is hedging his bets by reactivating the cold war and that seems to have caught our intelligence community by surprise.

It is clearly not in our interest for Russia to arm Iran and send them at us with Putin on the side of the radical mullahs. It is somewhat surprising that Russia would see this as in their interest too. However that becomes more reasonable if you accept Putin's view of a world whose future is filled with nuclear bombs. It appears Russia has accepted that the whole world being nuclear is probably an inevitable fact. We are still talking about denying Iran the bomb. Unless Democrats are ready to allow us to bomb Iran that will not happen. If Islam unites with Europe and sides with the communists of China we will have few allies in this nuclear war. This is the long term risk. The short term risk is no better.

What does it mean for America if Iran and several other nations go nuclear? Is there any way to deny the probability that nuclear war will follow? Is America still stubborn enough about freedom that we will win a nuclear war? Is it possible we will not even fight but simply surrender?

The recent elections do not give much hope. What is your position? Have you decided? (An even better question might be, "Have you even thought about nuclear war?")