The Cleanest State Meets The Pushiest Person

by Ann Coulter - December 3rd, 2008 - Yahoo News

On Election Day, Franken lost the U.S. Senate race in Minnesota to the Republican incumbent Sen. Norm Coleman by 725 votes. But over the next week, Democratic counties keep discovering new votes for Franken and subtracting votes from Coleman, claiming to be correcting "typos."

In all, Franken picked up 459 votes and Coleman lost 60 votes from these alleged "corrections."

As the inestimable economist John Lott pointed out, the "corrections" in the Senate race generated more new votes for Franken than all the votes added by corrections in every race in the entire state --- presidential, congressional, state house, sanitation commissioner and dogcatcher --- combined.

And yet the left-wing, George Soros-backed Secretary of State, Mark Ritchie, stoutly defended the statistically impossible "corrected" votes. There's something fishy going on in Minnesota besides the annual bigmouth bass tournament.

You bet there is, but it is not just Minnesota. It is amazing how few people notice but in every campaign recount Republican ballots get spoiled in huge numbers while almost no ballots ever get spoiled for the Democrat candidate. And whenever there are votes that are found they are always vastly disproportionately in favor of the Democrat candidate, totally out of line with any statistical probability. How strange is that?

In the year 2000 election thousands of George W. Bush ballots got spoiled on every single recount. Not until a crowd of Republicans pounded on the door of the recount rooms and demanded entry did the amazing spoiled ballot process stop happening. How strange is that?

If the Democrats who were running the recount had gotten a couple more chances to sabotage the votes, Al Gore would have been President. That is the actual reason Democrats were so angry and kept insisting that George Bush stole the election. To Democrats any act that interferes with their recounting until they win is stealing an election.

The explanation of how the election was stolen in Washington state is as obvious as it ever gets. Who honestly believes that 2,000 more absentee ballots can be turned in for a single district than are even requested? How impossible is that? If 100% of the requested ballots had been turned in the fraud would be obvious to anyone but an idiot. But 2,000 MORE than were requested? However our courts will never get involved in such a situation, even as they refused to get involved in Washington.

The courts only get involved when the Democrat is behind, the way Gore was in Florida. When the Democrat is ahead, they "let the legislature and executive branch officials" deal with the elections. Our courts, the most corrupt on the planet, would not want to interfere with an "honest" stealing of an election ... now would they?

What Ann is pointing out has been known for years. Our election system is rigged by Democrat officials to steal any close election. Republicans know that the only way to get elected is when it is not close. Close goes to the Democrats ... by fraud. I predict that Franken will find a way to steal enough votes to be declared winner. Welcome to socialist America in the 21st Century.